Identifying reasons for delay in accessing Early Intervention Services for rural Indigenous children with developmental disability: is there a gap and how do we close it?

Emma Gorman, Jennifer Preddy,
John Preddy, Head of Paediatrics, WWRRH, Wagga Wagga NSW Australia,
Pooja Kashap, Paediatric Registrar, WWRRH, Wagga Wagga NSW Australia 

Background

Significant differences exist in the prevalence of developmental delay between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children. Many factors influence engagement of the Indigenous population with intervention services, including cultural and social factors and accessibility in rural areas. This study aimed to evaluate delay in assessment and commencement of early intervention services (EIS) for Indigenous children with developmental disability (DD) compared to non-Indigenous children in the same region of rural NSW, and possible contributing barriers. 

Approach

This is a quantitative study comparing timing of EIS delivery to rural Indigenous and non-Indigenous children with DD. Indigenous children attending EIS were identified and separated into 2 groups: Indigenous and an equivalent number of non-Indigenous children selected after randomisation. Data was collected using a paper-based questionnaire. Results were interpreted using the Mann Whitney U test, to evaluate statistical significance.

Outcomes / Results

There was no significant difference between age of DD diagnosis between Indigenous and non-Indigenous, however there was significant delay (11.25 months versus 5.2 months) in referral of Indigenous children to EIS. Delay was attributed to lack of awareness regarding early intervention improving outcomes. Delay in assessment was worse for Indigenous children receiving ‘Out of Home Care’, reportedly because of frequent carer changes. Once referred, Indigenous and non-Indigenous children were assessed within a similar timeframe. 

Take Home Message

Significant delay exists in referral of Indigenous children for assessment and intervention for recognised DD. This delay was exaggerated for the most vulnerable Indigenous group, those in ‘Out of Home Care’. To improve outcomes, Indigenous children with suspected or confirmed DD should be immediately referred for EIS. Furthermore, those in ‘Out of Home Care’ should be routinely screened for DD and referred urgently to EIS as soon as a problem is identified.

November, 2020
10.37912/WaggaJOM.0201.25

Subscribe to our newsletter

Latest Articles

December, 2024
Cost-Effective Analysis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Models of Care, A Rural Perspective
Dr Thomas Skinner, BSci, M.D. Dr Symret Singh, BCom M.D. , Dr Nishmi Gunasingam Introduction Unlike many chronic conditions, Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) are often...
December, 2024
Can artificial intelligence play a role in the analysis of non-gated, non-cardiac CT?
Jack Evans, Professor Joseph Suttie Abstract The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has offered an opportunity to improve processing time and diagnostic accuracy of radiological images (1). Deep...
December, 2024
Asthma Morbidity and its Association with Socioeconomic Status in the Australian Population
Dr. Matin Zohoori Niya, Dr. Joanne Hart, Dr. Rajneesh Kaur Background Asthma Australia reports that prevalence of asthma is highest among people living in the lowest socioeconomic areas. Studies...
December, 2024
The Many Fronts of Heart Failure Monitoring – An Observational Study into Heart Failure Patients using Right Heart Catheterisation and Pulse Wave Analysis
Billy Poulden, Dr Audrey Adji, Professor Christopher Hayward Introduction Heart failure (HF) is a condition that occurs when a person’s heart is unable to pump enough blood to adequately...
December, 2024
Outcomes of Telepsychiatry in Australia, a clinical review
Helen Devery and Peter Sheeran Introduction Use of telephone and videoconferencing technologies by psychiatrists is a frequently proposed solution to address lack of resourcing and staff shortages in regional...